Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Order and the Court
NJ Business Matters Blog
By: Paul Tyahla
9.5.2008

NJ Business Matters, September 5, 2008

New Jersey's tort system is increasingly hostile to business. The Pacific Research Institute ranked our tort climate 49th in the nation, Atlantic County was named a Judicial Hellhole, and companies have responded by increasing costs for consumer goods.

Last year, CIANJ joined the New Jersey Lawsuit Reform Alliance. NJLRA's Executive Director, Marcus Rayner, even guest blogged for a week here at NJ Business Matters. Well Marcus is on to much larger audiences, and NJLRA and its mission are featured in today's Star-Ledger. Click here to check out the entire interview.

One statement worth highlighting,

The first bill has been proposed for introduction. It's to create an appeals bond cap.

New Jersey law requires that when a defendant tries to appeal a case, they have to purchase a bond from a lender in an amount the judge sets. The judge can set whatever amount he wants. The defendant has to put it in escrow with the court. These laws are about 120 years old. There is an appeal bond cap for tobacco companies set at $50 million.

We believe that bond cap should be extended to all defendants in civil matters. It's an access-to-court issue. A defendant has the right to appeal, just like a plaintiff. Having to put up an appeal bond adds to the litigation costs. It's a fundamental issue of fairness. The bond requirement can bar the courthouse door to some defendants.

CIANJ strongly supports this change to bring basic fairness in the appeals process. Look for us to blog on it a great deal in the coming months.

Posted by Paul Tyahla at 10:27 AM in Tort Reform | Permalink
Related Link
Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources