Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Unnecessary scrutiny of doctors hurts valuable research
Patriot Ledger Op-Ed
By: Sally C. Pipes
9.5.2008

Patriot Ledger (Quincy, MA), September 5, 2008
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA — John Roberts’ assertion that nurse practitioners play a “key role ... throughout the health care system” is spot-on (“Physicians not the only avenue for primary care,” Aug. 26).

Unfortunately, the bill he lauds – the Act to Promote Cost Containment, Transparency and Efficiency in the Delivery of Health Care – could harm those waiting for new cures.

Under the bill, all physicians and academic researchers who receive $50 or more from biopharmaceutical firms will have their names posted on the Internet.

While transparency is generally good, this suggests that there’s something wrong with these associations – even though the payments are neither illegal nor unethical.

According to the National Institutes of Health, there are nearly 6,000 clinical trials being conducted in Massachusetts right now.

How many of the doctors already involved in trials might drop out, deciding that the unwanted public attention isn’t worth it?

And how many of the physicians and academic scientists residing here might decide that the Bay State’s research climate is too hostile?

Biopharmaceutical companies are in the business of developing life-saving and life-enhancing medicines – and they depend on the expertise of physicians and academic scientists.

This legislation unwisely cuts into that relationship.


SALLY C. PIPES
President & CEO
Pacific Research Institute
San Francisco, Calif.

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources