Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Publications Archive
E-mail Print Medicare Advantage or Medicare Monopoly: Protecting Seniors’ Choices and Taxpayers’ Wallets in the Federal Government’s Largest Entitlement Program
PRI Study
By: John R. Graham
1.13.2010

This report by John R. Graham, Director of Health Studies at Pacific Research Institute, examines the costs and benefits of Medicare Advantage, which allows consumers to get their benefits through private insurance plans. Under the Senate Health Care bill, the Medicare Advantage program, would be cut by about $118 billion.

“In a very narrow sense, Medicare Advantage plans cost more per beneficiary than traditional Medicare,” said Mr. Graham. Medicare Advantage increases the total costs of Medicare by about $12 billion a year, or about 2 percent. However, because traditional Medicare (a government monopoly) does not pay providers enough to cover their costs, they shift costs to the privately insured. This imposes a “hidden tax” on privately insured Americans that accounts for $49 billion a year: four times greater than the narrowly defined extra costs of Medicare Advantage. “Most Medicare Advantage plans relieve this hidden tax because they are more likely to pay providers enough to cover their costs. Thus the ‘extra’ payments to Medicare Advantage are actually a method of exposing the hidden tax and transferring the burden from the privately insured to the government’s general accounting – that is society at large,” said Mr. Graham.

“Congress and the Obama administration intend to cut Medicare Advantage payments, without improving incentives for patients or providers to consume health services prudently. This would simply increase the “hidden tax” on the privately insured. It would also throw millions of Medicare beneficiaries back into traditional Medicare fee-for service, where they will face increasingly difficult access to care, because high-quality providers are bailing out of traditional Medicare. The government should re-consider this proposed policy, which breaks Medicare’s promise that seniors will enjoy good access to medical services.” added Mr. Graham.


Read PDF Study

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Publications
Browse by
Recent Publications
Publications Archive
Powered by eResources