Government Controlled Health Care Means Waiting Lines, Serious Drawbacks
John Stossel discovers some dead-serious drawbacks to socialized medicine.
When the government takes over, many critics say that you may not get the care and breakthroughs you need to save your life.
Watch “20/20” TONIGHT at 10 pm E.T for more.
“The only way they can get costs down under a government-run system is to control the amount of money that is spent on health care,” says Sally Pipes of the Pacific Research Institute, who was born in Canada, and is wary about government taking the reins of health care in the U.S.
“We are going to have denied care, lack of access to the latest technology, and long waiting lists, just like people do in Canada and Great Britain,” she warns.
In those countries, the government pays for all health care, and bureaucrats put limits on spending in order to control costs. They determine how much doctors can be reimbursed and put caps on the amount of money that can be spent on treatments.
The result of all this cost-cutting? People wait for care.
In England, shortages of dentists have caused hundreds of people to wait in line just for an appointment. The queues can be so long that some people have resorted to pulling out their own rotting teeth, using vodka and pliers as tools. One British hospital even tried to save money by not changing bed sheets. Instead of washing them, a British newspaper reported that the staff was encouraged to simply turn the sheets over. At any given time in Great Britain, there are over half a million people waiting to get into a hospital for treatments.
But Obama has said he doesn’t want a government takeover of health care.
“When you hear the naysayers claim that I’m trying to bring about government-run health care,” he told the American Medical Association last week, “know this — they’re not telling the truth.”
Note: This news segment has been postponed due to the death of entertainer Michael Jackson.