Sukses Main Mahjong Ways Best808 Pahami Scatter dan Kombinasinya Mahjong Ways Best808 Simbol Scatter Meningkatkan Peluang Menang Kesalahan Umum Pemain Mahjong Ways di Best808 Auto Jackpot Strategi Terbaik Fitur Scatter Mahjong Ways Best808 Mahjong Ways Best808 Panduan Scatter Wild Hasil Maksimal Pola Mahjong Ways Best808 Gacor Scatter Menang Bongkar Misteri Mahjong Ways Best808 Kunci Kemenanganmu Mau Cuan Maksimal di Mahjong Ways Best808 Trik Menggunakan Scatter Agar Lebih Untung Main Mahjong Ways di Best808 Kenali Pola Scatter Free Spin Gandakan Kemenanganmu Rahasia Scatter Mahjong Ways Best808 Strategi Jitu Menang Jackpot Besar Misteri Scatter Mahjong Ways Tol777 Kunci Jackpot Besar Bongkar Rahasia Mahjong Ways Tol777 Fitur Scatter Pola Menang Mahjong Ways Tol777 Simbol Scatter Kemenangan Besar Main Mahjong Ways di Tol777 Cara Memanfaatkan Scatter Strategi Mahjong Ways Tol777 Rahasia Scatter Trik Menang Jackpot Analisis Pola Permainan Mahjong Ways Keunggulan Mahjong Ways Tol777 vs Tradisional Kombinasi Simbol Tertinggi Mahjong Ways Langkah Meningkatkan Keahlian Mahjong Ways Mahjong Ways Tol777 Berbeda dari Permainan Mengapa Mahjong Ways Tol777 Diminati Dunia Optimalkan Putaran Mahjong Ways Tol777 Sejarah Mahjong Ways Tol777 dan Keunikan Simbol Mahjong Ways Tol777 dan Pemanfaatannya Strategi Lanjutan Mahjong Ways Tol777 Live RTP Dan Kasino Online Live RTP Dan Kasino Online Live RTP Dan Kasino Online Live RTP Dan Kasino Online Live RTP Dan Kasino Online Live RTP Dan Kasino Online Live RTP Dan Kasino Online Live RTP Dan Kasino Online Live RTP Dan Kasino Online Live RTP Dan Kasino Online Cara Cepat Kuasai Mahjong Ways Tol777 Mengapa Mahjong Ways Tol777 Populer Mitos & Fakta Mahjong Ways Tol777 Strategi Pemula vs Pro Mahjong Ways Teknik Profesional Mahjong Ways Tol777 Mahjong Ways Tol777: Keberuntungan atau Skill? Mahjong Ways Tol777: Tradisi dan Inovasi Panduan Mahjong Ways Tol777 untuk Pemula Rahasia Menang Mahjong Ways Tol777 Tips Efektif Main Mahjong Ways Tol777 Kasino Online Kasino Online Kasino Online Kasino Online Kasino Online Kasino Online Kasino Online Kasino Online Kasino Online Kasino Online main mahjong ways di malam hari jackpot profit mengamati permainan mahjong ways dengan baik dan benar merasa bosan pada malam hari? coba cara bermain mahjong ways ini minum kopi memotivasi bermain mahjong ways nelayan tebing tinggi pola mahjong ways hasil mencengangkan pelajar bandung download mahjong ways peluang besar trik dan pola mahjong ways pemuda belanda tato mahjong ways mengenang jackpot satu miliar pola rtp mahjong ways terbaik resep bermain mahjong ways dengan mudah slot mahjong ways dikenal sejak abad ke-11 hingga zaman milenial video mahjong ways viral menghebohkan warga indonesia warga jayamakmur dulu diremehkan, bermain mahjong ways hidup berlimpah harta unik keren bali cendera mata mahjong ways rp100000 warga bingung merek cat dinding sama mahjong ways

Price of Obamacare ‘savings’

The Obama administration appears to have received a rare bit of good news from one of the agencies managing its overhaul of the American health care system.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services just announced that the Accountable Care Organizations created by Obamacare in hopes of better coordinating seniors’ care had shown “encouraging initial results,” saving Medicare $380 million in their first year.

But that figure is much smaller than it appears. And no amount of savings can justify the perverse incentives the government has created for ACOs, which could result in a system of rationed health care.

ACOs — federally chartered networks of doctors and hospitals that share responsibility for patient care, starting with seniors — were created as a tool for slowing Medicare spending.

Today, there are more than 360 ACOs serving about 5.3 million Medicare beneficiaries around the country.

Those that meet certain benchmarks for spending and quality are allowed to keep some of the money they save. Those that don’t are penalized and have to return money to the federal government.

This financial incentive is intended to reduce wasteful spending on tests and procedures that are unlikely to have much of an impact.

In practice, however, ACOs could have devastating effects on seniors’ health.

For starters, the model gives government bureaucrats the power to determine what counts as quality patient care.

Many plans provide a target range for blood pressure that applies to all individuals equally — regardless of their individual circumstances, history, and medical status.

As Dr. Allan Goroll of Massachusetts General Hospital has commented, the feeling among doctors is that “these are silly metrics and they have no credibility and that they are really of no value.”

And since providers are paid more if they keep costs down, ACOs encourage doctors to opt for cheaper, less effective courses of treatment — or forgo certain treatments altogether.

Physician Kenneth Croen has warned that this situation will erode trust between doctors and Medicare beneficiaries, since “[p]atients will become suspicious that even appropriate recommendations for cost control are being made to pad the bonus for the ACO providers.”

In other words, health care providers have a strong incentive to ration care in the interest of saving money.

And that incentive may grow stronger, as the savings delivered by ACOs haven’t amounted to much thus far.

Of the 114 ACOs launched in 2012, not even half spent less than expected. Only 29 qualified for financial rewards by meeting the government’s cost and quality standards.

Of the 23 so-called Pioneer ACOs — the health care systems that the administration considered highest-performing and thus best-positioned to take advantage of potential savings — just nine registered both significantly lower spending growth and high quality of care.

Further, the $380 million in savings touted by the administration as evidence of the ACOs’ cost-cutting prowess represents about $80 per person over the course of the year — or less than 1 percent of spending.

Even these meager savings may be illusory in the long run. After all, by encouraging providers to consolidate as ACOs, Obamacare could diminish competition among doctors and hospitals. Those that remain would have enormous market power that they could use to demand high payments from private insurers. Higher health spending could be the result.

History shows that this risk is real.

Researchers at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation found that a wave of hospital consolidations in the 1990s raised inpatient prices by at least 5 percent. When the hospitals were near each other, prices increased by 40 percent or more.

Another study published by the journal Health Affairs examined the growth in health care costs after providers in California began integrating.

The authors concluded that “proposals to promote integrated care through models such as accountable care organizations (ACOs) could lead to higher rates for private payers.”

They went on to note that the potential increases in private health costs could erase any savings ACOs might deliver.

In their first year, a majority of Obamacare’s ACOs failed to achieve the savings the law envisioned for them. The temptation to ration care in response will only grow. Patients must not stand for such an outcome.

Nothing contained in this blog is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of the Pacific Research Institute or as an attempt to thwart or aid the passage of any legislation.

Scroll to Top