Drug Pricing

Blog

The U.S. Drug System Strikes a Reasonable Balance Between Incentivizing Innovation and Promoting Competition

The government explicitly grants innovators temporary market exclusivity to provide an opportunity for groundbreaking pharmaceutical companies to recover the costs of capital associated with developing novel treatments. This was one of the express purposes of past federal reform legislation, such as the Hatch-Waxman Act signed in 1984 and the Biologics ...
Commentary

Greater Price Transparency Will Improve Affordability

Inefficiencies plague our current healthcare system. Politicians are quick to blame these problems on the market and subsequently advocate for ever greater government control. But government programs, which are already major players in the healthcare market, provide lousy insurance for patients and undermine the viability of doctors and hospitals. Expanding ...
Commentary

The Big Beautiful Bill Fixes One Drug Problem—But Highlights An Even Bigger One

Buried within the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Donald Trump signed into law July 4, is a provision that could improve or even save the lives of the 30 million Americans suffering from rare diseases. That provision is the Orphan Cures Act, which exempts certain drugs that treat ...
Blog

Read part 1 of a 3 part series on drug pricing

Conspiracies Aside, Drug Company Profits Are Average

Recently, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) held its first of three listening sessions on the pharmaceutical market. The goal was to discuss reforms that will improve drug affordability by increasing “generic and biosimilar availability” and promoting “competition”. Achieving these goals is essential. The flaw of the first listening session is ...
Commentary

The Culprit Impeding Drug Competition Is Not Who The Feds Expected

The Federal Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Justice recently kicked off a series of listening sessions to examine barriers to competition in the drug industry. The title of the first session—”Anticompetitive Conduct by Pharmaceutical Companies”—made it seem that regulators would chiefly investigate biotech firms. Yet by the end, panelists ...
Commentary

Cheap Drugs from Canada Can’t Make America Healthy

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration just announced plans to help states and Indian tribes purchase certain prescription drugs from Canada, where brand-name medicines tend to be cheaper because the government caps their price. The new guidance is part of a larger Trump administration effort to cut drug prices for ...
Commentary

As PBMs Drive Up Drug Prices, Silence Is Not Golden

The Trump administration has been mum in recent weeks on its “most favored nation” drug pricing plan, which broadly aims to link U.S. prices for medicines to the lowest prices in other developed countries. It’s unclear what those prices will be, how they’ll be determined, or how the administration will ...
Commentary

A Promising New AIDS Drug Highlights The Dangers Of Price Controls

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a shot last month that effectively prevents HIV. At-risk people simply need to receive the injection every six months. The new drug, called lenacapavir, comes almost exactly 44 years after the first case of AIDS was reported by what’s now known as the ...
Commentary

Price Controls On Doctors Are Costing Patients Dearly

Just like the December 2024 continuing resolution, the current budget reconciliation bill fails to address the problem of Medicare reimbursing physicians at below market rates. Without a fix, the inevitable consequences will be worsening doctor shortages, declining healthcare quality, higher overall healthcare spending, and the accelerated loss of independent practices. ...
Commentary

A Real and Present Threat to Alzheimer’s Patients

It’s a quintessential government outcome. A program intended to increase access to promising medical innovations is actually preventing Medicare beneficiaries from receiving FDA-approved treatments. Medicare’s “coverage with evidence development” (CED) was never authorized by Congress. Instead, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services created the program in 2005 by leveraging ...
Blog

The U.S. Drug System Strikes a Reasonable Balance Between Incentivizing Innovation and Promoting Competition

The government explicitly grants innovators temporary market exclusivity to provide an opportunity for groundbreaking pharmaceutical companies to recover the costs of capital associated with developing novel treatments. This was one of the express purposes of past federal reform legislation, such as the Hatch-Waxman Act signed in 1984 and the Biologics ...
Commentary

Greater Price Transparency Will Improve Affordability

Inefficiencies plague our current healthcare system. Politicians are quick to blame these problems on the market and subsequently advocate for ever greater government control. But government programs, which are already major players in the healthcare market, provide lousy insurance for patients and undermine the viability of doctors and hospitals. Expanding ...
Commentary

The Big Beautiful Bill Fixes One Drug Problem—But Highlights An Even Bigger One

Buried within the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Donald Trump signed into law July 4, is a provision that could improve or even save the lives of the 30 million Americans suffering from rare diseases. That provision is the Orphan Cures Act, which exempts certain drugs that treat ...
Blog

Read part 1 of a 3 part series on drug pricing

Conspiracies Aside, Drug Company Profits Are Average

Recently, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) held its first of three listening sessions on the pharmaceutical market. The goal was to discuss reforms that will improve drug affordability by increasing “generic and biosimilar availability” and promoting “competition”. Achieving these goals is essential. The flaw of the first listening session is ...
Commentary

The Culprit Impeding Drug Competition Is Not Who The Feds Expected

The Federal Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Justice recently kicked off a series of listening sessions to examine barriers to competition in the drug industry. The title of the first session—”Anticompetitive Conduct by Pharmaceutical Companies”—made it seem that regulators would chiefly investigate biotech firms. Yet by the end, panelists ...
Commentary

Cheap Drugs from Canada Can’t Make America Healthy

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration just announced plans to help states and Indian tribes purchase certain prescription drugs from Canada, where brand-name medicines tend to be cheaper because the government caps their price. The new guidance is part of a larger Trump administration effort to cut drug prices for ...
Commentary

As PBMs Drive Up Drug Prices, Silence Is Not Golden

The Trump administration has been mum in recent weeks on its “most favored nation” drug pricing plan, which broadly aims to link U.S. prices for medicines to the lowest prices in other developed countries. It’s unclear what those prices will be, how they’ll be determined, or how the administration will ...
Commentary

A Promising New AIDS Drug Highlights The Dangers Of Price Controls

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a shot last month that effectively prevents HIV. At-risk people simply need to receive the injection every six months. The new drug, called lenacapavir, comes almost exactly 44 years after the first case of AIDS was reported by what’s now known as the ...
Commentary

Price Controls On Doctors Are Costing Patients Dearly

Just like the December 2024 continuing resolution, the current budget reconciliation bill fails to address the problem of Medicare reimbursing physicians at below market rates. Without a fix, the inevitable consequences will be worsening doctor shortages, declining healthcare quality, higher overall healthcare spending, and the accelerated loss of independent practices. ...
Commentary

A Real and Present Threat to Alzheimer’s Patients

It’s a quintessential government outcome. A program intended to increase access to promising medical innovations is actually preventing Medicare beneficiaries from receiving FDA-approved treatments. Medicare’s “coverage with evidence development” (CED) was never authorized by Congress. Instead, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services created the program in 2005 by leveraging ...
Scroll to Top